Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Catskill Mountains Chapter of v. United States Environmental Pr
as 14-1997
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc., Theodore Gordon Flyfishers, Inc., Catskill-Deleware Natural Water Alliance, Inc. and others
Defendant:
City of New York, State of Texas, State of Alaska and others
Defendant - Appellant:
South Florida Water Management District
Catskill Mountains Chapter of v. United States Environmental Pr
as 14-2016
Plaintiff:
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc., Theodore Gordon Flyfishers, Inc., Catskill-Deleware Natural Water Alliance, Inc. and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Government of the Province of Manitoba, Canada
Defendant:
State of Texas, State of Alaska, State of Idaho and others
Defendant - Appellee:
States of Colorado, New Mexico, et al., Central Arizona Water Conservation District, City and County of San Francisco Public Utilities Commission and others
Defendant - Appellant:
South Florida Water Management District
Catskill Mountains Chapter of v. United States Environmental Pr
as 14-1909
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc., Theodore Gordon Flyfishers, Inc., Catskill-Deleware Natural Water Alliance, Inc. and others
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Stephen L. Johnson, in his official capacity as ADMINISTRATOR OF THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, City of New York and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Central Arizona Water Conservation District, City and County of Denver, by and through its Board of Water Commissioners, Central Utah Water Conservancy District and others
Catskill Mountains Chapter of v. United States Environmental Pr
as 14-1823
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc., Theodore Gordon Flyfishers, Inc., Catskill-Deleware Natural Water Alliance, Inc. and others
Defendant:
State of Texas, State of Alaska, State of Idaho and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Stephen L. Johnson, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and South Florida Water Management District
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
States of Colorado, New Mexico, et al., Central Arizona Water Conservation District, City and County of San Francisco Public Utilities Commission and others
State Water Contractors, et al v. Gary Locke, et al
as 12-15290
Plaintiff:
SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, STOCKTON EAST WATER DISTRICT and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE WATER CONTRACTORS
Intervenor-Plaintiff:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY LOCKE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS/INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESEARCH, THE BAY INSTITUTE, CALIFORNIA TROUT and others
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water, et al v. Gary Locke, et al
as 12-15289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY and WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT
Plaintiff:
STOCKTON EAST WATER DISTRICT, METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY LOCKE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS/INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESEARCH, THE BAY INSTITUTE, CALIFORNIA TROUT and others
Kern County Water Agency, et al v. Gary Locke, et al
as 12-15291
Plaintiff:
SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, STOCKTON EAST WATER DISTRICT and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY and COALITION FOR A SUSTAINABLE DELTA
Intervenor-Plaintiff:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY LOCKE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS/INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESEARCH, THE BAY INSTITUTE, CALIFORNIA TROUT and others
Metropolitan Water District of, et al v. Gary Locke, et al
as 12-15293
Plaintiff:
SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, STOCKTON EAST WATER DISTRICT and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Intervenor-Plaintiff:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY LOCKE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS/INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESEARCH, THE BAY INSTITUTE, CALIFORNIA TROUT and others
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water, et al v. Gary Locke, et al
as 12-15296
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, STOCKTON EAST WATER DISTRICT and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
Defendant - Appellant:
GARY LOCKE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and others
Intervenor-Defendant:
PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS/INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESEARCH, THE BAY INSTITUTE, CALIFORNIA TROUT and others
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water, et al v. Pacific Coast Federation of, et al
as 12-15144
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, STOCKTON EAST WATER DISTRICT and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
Defendant:
GARY LOCKE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS/INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESEARCH, THE BAY INSTITUTE, CALIFORNIA TROUT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
