Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 38 of 38
STONEBRIDGE BANK v. NITA PROPERTIES, LLC
as 2:2009cv03380
Plaintiff: STONEBRIDGE BANK
Defendant: NITA PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Type: Contract None
STONEBRIDGE BANK v. NITA PROPERTIES, LLC
as 2:2009cv03376
Plaintiff: STONEBRIDGE BANK
Defendant: NITA PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Type: Contract None
STONEBRIDGE BANK v. PATEL et al
as 2:2009cv03382
Plaintiff: STONEBRIDGE BANK
Defendant: KIRAN PATEL and NITA PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Type: Contract None
STONEBRIDGE BANK v. NITA PROPERTIES, LLC
as 2:2009cv03381
Plaintiff: STONEBRIDGE BANK
Defendant: NITA PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Type: Contract None
STONEBRIDGE BANK v. PATEL et al
as 2:2009cv03379
Plaintiff: STONEBRIDGE BANK
Defendant: KIRAN PATEL and NITA PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Type: Contract None
STONEBRIDGE BANK v. PATEL et al
as 2:2009cv03377
Plaintiff: STONEBRIDGE BANK
Defendant: KIRAN PATEL and NITA PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract None
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. A TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.069 ACRES OF LAND IN EAST CALN TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 40-2F-0019 et al
as 2:2009cv01064
Plaintiff: TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant: A TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.069 ACRES OF LAND IN EAST CALN TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 40-2F-0019, CATHLENE C. WAGNER, CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Real Property None
ENGEL GROUP, LLC et al v. KELLER et al
as 2:2008cv06020
Plaintiff: ENGEL GROUP, LLC
Defendant: STONEBRIDGE BANK, STONEBRIDGE BANK, DAVID KELLER and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?