Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,085
Stover v. White
as 24-3035
Petitioner: SHANNON WAYNE STOVER
Respondent: DAN WHITE, Superintendent
Morton v. Bennett
as 24-3009
Petitioner: CECIL L. MORTON
Respondent: JASON BENNETT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Butsch v. Bennett
as 24-3017
Petitioner: CLAYTON E. BUTSCH
Respondent: JASON BENNETT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Garvie v. Bennett
as 24-2965
Petitioner: EUGENE BRIAN GARVIE
Respondent: JASON BENNETT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Irby v. Morner, et al.
as 24-2908
Plaintiff: TERRANCE JON IRBY
Defendant: JACK MORNER, Superintendent of Prison, KEVIN BOWEN, Administrator Mission Housing, Chair of Mission Housing Department of Corrections and RONALD MEYERS, Custody Supervisor of IMU Unit C.U.S.
Misuraca v. Ireland, et al.
as 24-2843
Plaintiff: AIRIAN JOVAN MISURACA
Defendant: STEPHEN IRELAND, all individual and in their official capacities, Nurse Practitioner FRANKS, (NP Franks) (Nurse at SRCI); all individual and in their official capacities, ASHLEY CLEMMENTS, (Nurse at SRCI); all individual and in their official capacities and others
Al-Almin v. Miller
as 24-2792
Petitioner: HAFEEZ IBNSALEEM AL-ALMIN
Respondent: JAMIE MILLER, Superintendent, SRCI
West v. Miller
as 24-2717
Petitioner: BOB EUGENE WEST, JR.
Respondent: JAMIE MILLER, SUPERINTENDENT
Lotches v. Premo
as 24-2652
Petitioner: ERNEST N. LOTCHES
Respondent: JEFF PREMO, as Superintendent, Oregon State Prison
Human Rights Defense Center, Inc. v. Uttecht, et al.
as 24-2552
Plaintiff: HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER, INC.
Defendant: JEFFERY ALFRED UTTECHT, Superintendent of Coyote Ridge Corrections Center of the Washington Department of Corrections in his individual and official capacities and JOHN D. TURNER, Mailroom Sergeant of Coyote Ridge Corrections Center in his individual and official capacities

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?