Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 23
United States of America et al v. General Recycling of Washington LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00329
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ON BEHALF OF THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION AND THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, The State of Washington through the Washington Department of Ecology, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe and others
Defendant: General Recycling of Washington, LLC, The David J. Joseph Company and Nucor Steel Seattle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6972 Environmental Matters
The United States of America, on behalf of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the United States Department of the Interior et al v. Crowley Marine Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00307
Plaintiff: The United States of America, on behalf of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the United States Department of the Interior, The State of Washington through the Washington Department of Ecology, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe and others
Defendant: Crowley Marine Services, Inc., 8th Avenue Terminals, Inc. and Washington Department of Transportation
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Swinomish Indian Tribal Cmty., et al v. Lummi Nation
as 21-35874
Petitioner: SWINOMISH INDIAN TRIBAL COMMUNITY, TULALIP TRIBES and UPPER SKAGIT INDIAN TRIBE
Respondent: LUMMI NATION
Appellant: JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE and PORT GAMBLE S'KLALLAM TRIBE
Not Classified By Court: STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE OF INDIANS, HOH INDIAN TRIBE, SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE and others
Swinomish Indian Tribal Cmty., et al v. Lummi Nation
as 21-35812
Petitioner: SWINOMISH INDIAN TRIBAL COMMUNITY, TULALIP TRIBES and UPPER SKAGIT INDIAN TRIBE
Respondent: LUMMI NATION
Not Classified By Court: STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE OF INDIANS, HOH INDIAN TRIBE, SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE and others
Makah Indian Tribe v. State of Washington, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-35369
Plaintiff - Appellee: MAKAH INDIAN TRIBE
Defendant: STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant: QUILEUTE INDIAN TRIBE and QUINAULT INDIAN NATION
Real Party In Interest: HOH INDIAN TRIBE, LUMMI INDIAN NATION, PORT GAMBLE S'KLALLAM TRIBE and others
USA, et al v. Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-35760
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner - Appellant: SKOKOMISH INDIAN TRIBE
Respondent - Appellee: JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE, PORT GAMBLE S'KLALLAM TRIBE and SQUAXIN ISLAND TRIBE
Defendant: STATE OF WASHINGTON
Real-party-in-interest: TULALIP TRIBES, QUILEUTE INDIAN TRIBE, HOH TRIBE and others
Skokomish Indian Tribe v. Leonard Forsman, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-35336
Plaintiff - Appellant: SKOKOMISH INDIAN TRIBE, a federally recognized Indian tribe, on its own behalf and as parens patriae of all enrolled members of the Indian tribe
Defendant - Appellee: LEONARD FORSMAN, Chairman of the Suquamish Tribal Council, BARDOW LEWIS, Vice-Chairman of the Suquamish Tribal Council, NIGEL LAWRENCE, Secretary of the Suquamish Tribal Council and others
Nisqually Indian Tribe v. Squaxin Island Tribe
as 17-35314
Petitioner - Appellant: NISQUALLY INDIAN TRIBE
Respondent - Appellee: SQUAXIN ISLAND TRIBE
Real-party-in-interest: PUYALLUP TRIBE, JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE, PORT GAMBLE S'KLALLAM TRIBE and others
Skokomish Indian Tribe v. Forsman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv05639
Plaintiff: Skokomish Indian Tribe
Defendant: Leonard Forsman, Bardow Lewis, Nigel Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Makah Indian Tribe, et al v. Quileute Indian Tribe, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-35824
Plaintiff - Appellant: MAKAH INDIAN TRIBE
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent - Appellee: QUILEUTE INDIAN TRIBE and QUINAULT INDIAN NATION
Defendant: STATE OF WASHINGTON
Real Party In Interest: HOH INDIAN TRIBE, LUMMI INDIAN NATION, PORT GAMBLE S'KLALLAM TRIBE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?