Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Ghafoori et al v. Bank of America Home Loans et al
as 4:2024cv01267
Plaintiff:
Saeed Ghafoori and Gissou Beykpour Ghafoori
Defendant:
Bank of America Home Loans, Bank of America, N.A. Successor by Merger to Bank of America Home Loan Servicing, Bank of New York Mellon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ConocoPhillips Company v. BPG Pacific, et al
as 10-17366
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
BPG PACIFIC, a California Limited Liability Company, COPELAND CREEK APARTMENTS, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, SAEED GHAFOORI, AKA Paul Ghafoori and others
Defendant:
MILESTONE PACIFIC PROPERTIES, LLC and FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
ConocoPhillips Company v. Milestone Pacific Properties LLC et al
as 4:2010cv00079
Plaintiff:
ConocoPhillips Company
Defendant:
Milestone Pacific Properties LLC, BPG Pacific, LLC, Copeland Creek Apartments, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
ConocoPhillips Company v. Milestone Pacific Properties LLC et al
as 3:2010cv00079
Plaintiff:
ConocoPhillips Company
Defendant:
Milestone Pacific Properties LLC, BPG Pacific, LLC, Copeland Creek Apartments, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
ConocoPhillips Company v. Milestone Pacific Properties LLC et al
as 3:2008cv02695
Plaintiff:
ConocoPhillips Company and ConocoPhillips Company
Defendant:
Milestone Pacific Properties LLC, BPG Pacific LLC, Copeland Creek Apartments LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ConocoPhillips Company v. Milestone Pacific Properties LLC et al
as 4:2008cv02695
Plaintiff:
ConocoPhillips Company and ConocoPhillips Company
Defendant:
Milestone Pacific Properties LLC, BPG Pacific LLC, Copeland Creek Apartments LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
