Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Sandy v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv02685
Petitioner:
Kester Sandy
Respondent:
United States of America and United States Probation and Pretrial Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sandy v. United States Probation and Pretrial Services
as 1:2023cv01654
Petitioner:
Kester Sandy
Respondent:
United States Probation and Pretrial Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sandy v. U.S. Probation and Pretrial Services
as 1:2022cv03593
Petitioner:
Kester Sandy
Respondent:
U.S. Probation and Pretrial Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sandy v. United States Probation and Pretrial Services
as 1:2022cv04171
Petitioner:
Kester Sandy
Respondent:
United States Probation and Pretrial Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sandy v. Barometre
as 1:2021cv03099
Petitioner:
Kester Sandy
Respondent:
Delta Barometre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Velez v. Kelsey et al
as 6:2020cv06072
Defendant:
L. Baker, John Doe, Sandy Kelsey and others
Plaintiff:
Michael-Tony Velez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv00809
Plaintiff:
Sandy Gomez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lewis v. Arkhurst et al
as 1:2019cv02831
Defendant:
Correction Officer John Doe #3, Correction Officer Sandy Arkhurst, Correction Officer Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Moriyah Raziel Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romano v. Hall, et al
as 1:2018cv01225
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Sandy Kelsey and B. Hall
Plaintiff:
Anthony Romano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandy v. Fields
as 1:2018cv01373
Petitioner:
Kester Sandy
Respondent:
Superintendent Leroy Fields
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
