Cases 1 - 10 of 457
Martinez-Santiago v. Garland
as 24-2546
Petitioner:
AURELIO MARTINEZ-SANTIAGO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Santiago-Tito, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2322
Petitioner:
ELVIS IVAN SANTIAGO-TITO, SMITH JEAMPIER SANTIAGO-QUISPE, JUAN CARLOS SANTIAGO-TITO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Barrett Business Services, Inc. v. Colmenero, et al.
as 24-2032
Plaintiff:
BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
CHARLES COLMENERO, DENELL HOPKINS, SANTIAGO ALEJO and others
Motivar Gonzalez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1464
Petitioner:
STEFANY MOTIVAR GONZALEZ, YIMMI ALEXANDER ROBALLO PAYARES, EDDIE SANTIAGO ARANGO MOTIVAR and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Camargo Rincon, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1376
Petitioner:
CAMILO ANDRE CAMARGO RINCON, CLAUDIA MARCELA SANCHEZ-GUZMAN and ANDRES SANTIAGO CAMARGO-SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Suta Cuestas, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1284
Petitioner:
MANUEL ANDRES SUTA CUESTAS, YENNY ANGELICA AYALA VELASQUEZ, KEVIN SANTIAGO SUTA AYALA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
De Santiago-Mendoza v. Garland
as 24-1293
Petitioner:
MARTIN DE SANTIAGO-MENDOZA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Barrett Business Services, Inc. v. Colmenero, et al.
as 24-770
Plaintiff:
BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
CHARLES COLMENERO, DENELL HOPKINS, and the marital community comprised thereof, SANTIAGO ALEJO and others
Castaneda-Castaneda, et al. v. Garland
as 24-613
Petitioner:
OMAR CASTANEDA-CASTANEDA, ESTER SARAI RIVAS-TEJADA and SANTIAGO ALEXANDER CASTANEDA-RIVAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Terry Fabricant et al v. Pro Source Lending Group LLC
as 2:2024cv00795
Plaintiff:
Terry Fabricant and Isaac Santiago
Defendant:
Pro Source Lending Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
