Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Saul Kaufman, et al v. American Express Travel Relate, et al
as 16-1806
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAUL M. KAUFMAN and KIMBERLY STEGICH
Defendant:
AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Appellee:
HEATHER RONAN, JESSICA CASTEEL, J.G. GOODMAN, also known as J.L. Goodman and others
Saul Kaufman, et al v. American Express Travel Relate
as 16-1766
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SAUL M. KAUFMAN, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated and KIMBERLY STEGICH
Appellant:
HEATHER RONAN and JESSICA CASTEEL
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INCORPORATED
J.G. Goodman, et al v. American Express Travel Relate
as 16-1691
Plaintiff:
SAUL M. KAUFMAN, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated and KIMBERLY STEGICH
Plaintiff - Appellant:
J.G. GOODMAN, also known as J.L. Goodman, Objector and CARLA SANTSCHE, Objector
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Charles Robinson v. American Express Travel Relate
as 16-1685
Plaintiff:
SAUL M. KAUFMAN, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated and KIMBERLY STEGICH
Appellant:
CHARLES ROBINSON, Objector
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Saul Kaufman v. American Express Travel Relate
as 08-1751
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SAUL M. KAUFMAN, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Kaufman v. American Express Travel Related Services, Inc.
as 1:2007cv01707
Plaintiff:
Saul M. Kaufman and Saul M. Kaufman
Defendant:
American Express Travel Related Services, Inc., American Express Travel Related Services, Inc., American Express Travel Related Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
