Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Schofield v. Dekleva
as 6:2014cv01979
Petitioner:
Preston Schofield
Respondent:
James Dekleva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Schofield v. Dekleva
as 6:2014cv01187
Petitioner:
Preston Schofield
Respondent:
James Dekleva, State of Florida and Sheriff, Seminole County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Schofield v. Dekleva et al
as 6:2014cv01188
Petitioner:
Preston Schofield
Respondent:
James Dekleva, State Of Florida and Donald Eslinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schofield v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2014cv00872
Petitioner:
Preston Schofield
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Schofield v. Dekleva
as 8:2013cv02997
Petitioner:
Preston Schofield
Respondent:
James Dekleva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Schofield v. Dekleva
as 6:2013cv01856
Petitioner:
Preston Schofield
Respondent:
James Dekleva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Schofield v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2013cv01789
Petitioner:
Preston Schofield
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Schofeild v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv01369
Petitioner:
Glenn Schofield
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Schofield v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2013cv01669
Petitioner:
Preston Schofield
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Schofield v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2013cv01835
Petitioner:
Preston Schofield
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
