Cases 11 - 20 of 5,956
Anesh Gupta v. Attorney General, et al
as 24-11296
Plaintiff:
ANESH GUPTA
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DIRECTOR, CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Jorge Almeida v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11318
Petitioner:
JORGE ALMEIDA
Respondent:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Dusty Bowman v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11274
Plaintiff:
DUSTY L. BOWMAN
Defendant:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MR RICHARD COMERFORD, Deputy Secty of Institutions, WAKULLA CI WARDEN and others
OShea Jackson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11243
Petitioner:
OSHEA TERRELL JACKSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Morgan Leppert v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11184
Petitioner:
MORGAN AMANDA LEPPERT
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Raymond Claudio v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 24-11194
Petitioner:
RAYMOND CLAUDIO
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Kyle Melady, et al v. USA
as 24-11186
Petitioner:
KYLE MELADY
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Gabriel Nock v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11180
Petitioner:
GABRIEL BRIAN NOCK
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Ricardo Tull v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11172
Petitioner:
RICARDO TULL
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Larry JamisonIn re: Larry Jamison
as 24-11132
Petitioner:
In re: LARRY LEE JAMISON
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
