Cases 1 - 10 of 333
Saleh et al v. Blinken et al
as 5:2024cv02450
Plaintiff:
Mahmood Ahmed Fadhl Saleh and S.M.A.F.
Defendant:
Secretary Antony Blinken, Jonathan Goodale Pratt, Embassy of the United States of Djibouti and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ferreira v. Mayorkas et al
as 4:2024cv01820
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gomes Ferreira
Defendant:
Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Connie Nolan
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Christian v. Betak
as 5:2024cv01867
Plaintiff:
President Donald J. Christian
Defendant:
CFO Secretary George M Betak
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01860
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
