Cases 1 - 10 of 43
L v. Decker
as 24-718
Petitioner:
J L
Respondent:
THOMAS DECKER, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice
Hodge v. Mayorkas
as 23-7988
Petitioner / Appellant:
OSVALDO HODGE
Respondent / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, THOMAS BROPHY, in his official capacity as Acting Field Office Director, Buffalo Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Santos-Torres v. Houghton
as 22-297
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sandro Yobani Santos-Torres
Defendant / Appellee:
Timothy J. Houghton, in his official capacity, District Director, New York District Office, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Tracy Renaud, in his official capacity, Senior Official peforming the duties of the Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, in his official capacity, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Sylvain v. Garland
as 21-2897
Petitioner / Appellant:
Colby Sylvain
Respondent / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General, of the United States, Alejandro Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Jean King, in her official capacity as director of the Executive Office Of Immigration Review and others
Banegas v. Decker
as 21-1682
Petitioner:
Alonso Banegas
Respondent:
Director Thomas R. Decker, New York Field Office, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Merrick B. Garland and others
Forbes v. Garland
as 21-1507
Petitioner:
Curry W. Forbes
Respondent:
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as Acting Assistant Field Office Director and Administrator, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility Director Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Santiago Franco v. Searls
as 21-1189
Respondent:
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as United States Attorney General, Thomas J. Feely, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, Buffalo Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
Pedro Fernando Santiago Franco
Maradiaga v. Decker
as 21-1184
Respondent:
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Tae Johnson, in his official capacity as Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
Javier Castillo Maradiaga
Jimenez v. Decker
as 21-1188
Respondent:
Sheriff Carl E. Dubois, Sheriff, Orange County, Merrick B. Garland, Acting U.S. Attorney General, Thomas Decker, Director, New York Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
Salomon Aparicio Jimenez
Garcia v. Decker
as 21-1109
Respondent / Appellee:
Thomas Decker, Director, New York Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Sheriff Carl E. Dubois, Sheriff, Orange County, Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Attorney General and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Mario Rene Garcia
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
