Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Mukhar Mursal v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-3386
Petitioner:
Mukhar Mohamed Mursal
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Not Classified By Court:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Hafils Akpovi v. David Douglas, et al
as 21-2852
Petitioner / Appellant:
Hafils Y. Akpovi
Defendant / Appellee:
David Douglas, District Director USCIS Nebraska District Office, William Connor, Field Office Director U.S.Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director, U.S. Citzenship and Immigration Services and others
Mohammed Siddiqui, et al v. ICE, et al
as 20-2762
Petitioner:
Sergio Gallego, Inemo Seimokuma Clement, Sauveur Victor and others
Respondent / Appellee:
Joel L. Brott, Sherburne County Sheriff, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, Matthew Albence, Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Mohammed Siddiqui
Karla Gilbertson v. William P. Barr, et al
as 20-2355
Petitioner:
Karla Monika Gilbertson
Respondent:
Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States
Gertrude Nyanjega, et al v. David Douglas, et al
as 19-1868
Defendant / Appellee:
Elaine Duke, Ag-Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Leslie Tritten, Field Office Director, William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gertrude Nyanjega and Duba Roba
Khamphee Kells, et al v. Janet Napolitano, et al
as 09-3770
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Khamphee Kells, M.S. and E.B.
Defendant - Appellant:
Janet Napolitano, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Alejandro Mayorkas, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
