Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Ifeji v. Garland
as 24-484
Defendant: BRETT EISELE, central pinal justice court precinct 3 judge et al., Central Pinal Justice Court Precinct 3 HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, MARIAN BROWN, dallas county sherrif et al., DALLAS COUNTY SHERRIFS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, GLENN HEGAR, texas secretary of state et al., TEXAS COMPTROLLERS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS and others
Plaintiff: JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI, a Mooress beneficiary EMPRESS JAZLIN TRUST A Empress, Admiral, Mariner A, Merchant, Piloter Nations a private Moor aboriginal texan national territory of Spain, JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI ESTATE ET. AL., beneficiary, JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR ESTATE ET AL., beneficiary JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR et al. and others
Motley v. Janae Rocquel Motley Estate
as 24-1
Plaintiff / Appellant: JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY
Defendant / Appellee: JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY ESTATE, beneficiary JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY, DYMARION RASHAD BROOKS ESTATE, beneficiary DYMARION RASHAD BROOKS, DERRION RASHAD BROOKS ESTATE, beneficiary DERRION RASHAD BROOKS and others
Victor Luque v. Antony Blinken
as 21-16012
Plaintiff / Appellant: VICTOR LUQUE LUQUE
Defendant / Appellee: ANTONY J. BLINKEN, Secretary of State of the United States of America
Martin Ruiz v. Antony Blinken, et al
as 21-5029
Defendant / Appellee: Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State of the United States, U.S. Department of State, Monty Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General of the United States, U.S. Department of Justice, David P. Pekoske, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Martin Moreno Ruiz
James Whitfield v. U.S. Secretary of State We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-13071
Respondent / Appellee: U.S. SECRETARY OF STATE and SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant: JAMES WHITFIELD
Cecilia Botello v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-5243
Defendant / Appellee: Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary for Homeland Security, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, an Unofficial Policy Maker usurping the Congress of the United States and Michael R. Pompeo, Secretary of State of the United States
Plaintiff / Appellant: Cecilia Maria Fuentes Botello, Cuban National and Asylum Applicant under the U.N. International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights Treaty signed by the United States with condition under the Fifth, Eight and Fourteenth Amendment to the Constituti
ASSE International, Inc. v. Michael Pompeo, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-55979
Plaintiff - Appellant: ASSE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL POMPEO, Secretary of State of the United States, JENNIFER ZIMDAHL GALT and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
ASSE International, Inc. v. John Kerry, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-56742
Plaintiff - Appellant: ASSE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN F. KERRY, Secretary of State of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and KERI M LOWRY, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Private Sector Exchange, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs
Movimiento Democracia, Inc., et al v. Secretary, Department of Home, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-16732
Plaintiff - Appellant: MOVIMIENTO DEMOCRACIA, INC., LIBAN CONCEPCION LIO, ALEXEIS LEYVA and others
Defendant - Appellee: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
ASSE International, Inc. v. John Kerry, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-56402
Plaintiff - Appellant: ASSE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN F. KERRY, Secretary of State of the United States, ROBIN LERNER, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Private Sector Exchange, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?