Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00765
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv01234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv23825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Conservation Alliance of St. Lucie County, Inc. et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 2:2014cv14192
Plaintiff:
Conservation Alliance of St. Lucie County, Inc. and Treasure Coast Environmental Defense Fund
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, Secretary of the Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv00241
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Citizens for Smart Growth, et al v. Sec, Dept. of Trans., et al
as 10-12253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CITIZENS FOR SMART GROWTH, a Florida Non Profit Corporation, ODIAS SMITH, an individual and KATHIE SMITH, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Mary E. Peters, J RICHARD CAPKA, Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, DAVID C. GIBBS, P.E. Division Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, Florida Division and others
Citizens for Smart Growth et al v. Secretary of the Department of Transportation et al
as 2:2007cv14122
Plaintiff:
Citizens for Smart Growth, Citizens for Smart Growth, Citizens for Smart Growth and others
Defendant:
Secretary of the Department of Transportation, J Richard Capka, David C Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
