Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-297
Petitioner / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2937
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
D.O.A. v. Decker
as 21-2517
Petitioner / Appellant: D.O.A.
Respondent / Appellee: Thomas R. Decker, New York Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Sheriff Carl E. Dubois, Director of the Orange County Correctional Facility, H. Kevin Mart, Acting Assistant Chief Judge, Executive Office of Immigration Review; J and others
D.O.A. v. Decker
as 21-2303
Petitioner: D.O.A.
Respondent: Thomas R. Decker, New York Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Sheriff Carl E. Dubois, Director of the Orange County Correctional Facility, H. Kevin Mart, Acting Assistant Chief Judge, Executive Office of Immigration Review; J and others
Onosamba-Ohindo v. Garland
as 21-1044
Defendant: Matthew Albence, in his official capacity as Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Robert M. Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the Department of Justice, Executive Office For Immigration Review and others
Defendant / Appellee: Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as the Acting Administrator of the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
Plaintiff: Antonio Lopez Agustin, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellant: Junior Onosamba-Ohindo, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Vazquez Perez v. Decker
as 21-319
Respondent / Appellee: Robert M. Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Acting Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of Justice, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner / Appellant: Uriel Vazquez Perez, on his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated
Vazquez Perez v. Decker
as 21-192
Respondent: United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Robert M. Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Acting Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of Justice and others
Petitioner: Uriel Vazquez Perez, on his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated
Onosamba-Ohindo v. Barr
as 20-3712
Defendant / Appellant: Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as the Acting Administrator of the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
Defendant: Matthew Albence, in his official capacity as Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Executive Office For Immigration Review, James McHenry, in his official capacity as the Director of the Executive Office for Immigration and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Antonio Lopez Agustin, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and Junior Onosamba-Ohindo, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Velesaca v. Wolf
as 20-2153
Petitioner: Jose L. Velesaca, on behalf of himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Abraham Carlo Uzategui Navarro, on behalf of himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Respondent: Matthew Albence, in his official capacity as the Acting Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Thomas R. Decker, in his official capacity as New York Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Valenzuela Arias v. Decker
as 20-2139
Petitioner: Edson Louis, Santo Valenzuela Arias and Job Velasquez Estrada
Defendant / Appellant: Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Director of the New York Field Office of U.S. Immigrations & Customs Enforcement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?