Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Legends Collision LLC et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 6:2014cv06006
Defendant:
Travelers Property Casualty Company, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Raintree Auto Body Incorporated, Robert K Isham, Jan's European Auto Body Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Southern Collision & Restoration, LLC v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 6:2014cv06005
Defendant:
Travelers Property Casualty Company, The Hanover Insurance Company, Allstate Property and Casualty Company and others
Plaintiff:
Southern Collision & Restoration, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Parker Auto Body Inc et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co et al
as 6:2014cv06004
Plaintiff:
Taylor Auto Body L L C, Johnnies Paint & Body Shop Inc, Ginns Automotive Frame Shop L L C and others
Defendant:
Progressive Paloverde Insurance Company, American National General Insurance Co, Travelers Indemnity Company of America and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
In re: Auto Body Shop Antitrust Litigation
as 6:2014md02557
Defendant:
First Acceptance Insurance Company, Inc., Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange, Foremost County Mutual Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Taylor Auto Body L L C, Ginns Automotive Frame Shop L L C, Alexander Body Shop, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
A & E Auto Body, Inc. et al v. 21st Century Centennial Insurance Company et al
as 6:2014cv00310
Plaintiff:
Stewart Agency, Inc. doing business as Earl Stewart Toyota of North Palm Beach, Regal Pontiac, Inc., American Paint & Body, Inc. and others
Defendant:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company, First Acceptance Insurance Company, Inc., Security National Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
