Cases 1 - 5 of 5
United States For Use And Bene, et al v. Guarantee Company of North Ame
as 18-15646
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES FOR USE AND BENEFIT OF SEQUOIA ELECTRIC, LLC and SEQUOIA ELECTRIC, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
GUARANTEE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA USA
Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust et al v. Sequoia Electric, LLC
as 2:2015cv02224
Defendant:
Sequoia Electric, LLC
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Operating Engineers Health & Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Journeyman and Apprentice Training Trust, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
United States et al v. Guarantee Company of North America USA
as 2:2014cv02045
Defendant:
Guarantee Company of North America USA
Plaintiff:
Sequoia Electric, LLC
415) 744-6576 (fax:
United States
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Sequoia Electric, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00751
Plaintiff:
Sequoia Electric Underground, LLC and Sequoia Electric, LLC
Defendant:
Trustees of the Laborers Joint Trust Fund
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust et al v. Sagebrush Property Ventures, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv01179
Counter Claimant:
Blake Barsy, Blake J. Barsy, Desert Seguro, LLC and others
Defendant:
Blake Barsy, Blake J. Barsy, Desert Seguro, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Trustees of the Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Journeyman and Apprentice Training Trust, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Journeyman and Apprentice Training Trust, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
