Cases 1 - 10 of 282
Khazin v. City of New York
as 24-1236
Plaintiff:
Sergeant VALENTIN KHAZIN and LAWRENCE HAWKINS
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, SYLVESTER GE, JOHN SANFORD and others
Johnson v. Chappius
as 24-1225
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON
Defendant:
Superintendent PAUL CHAPPIUS, Jr., GREGORY KELLER, Deputy Superintendent For Security, Lieutenant TIMOTHY CARROLL and others
Burrell v. Bishop
as 24-1155
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
BISHOP, Deputy of Security, Sergeant LOCKE, Sergeant CONTO and others
El v. Chun
as 24-1142
Defendant:
BLAIR, JOSEPH FUCITO, Sergeant PETER LITRA, Shield #1197 and others
Plaintiff:
SAGE EL
Chepilko v. Henry
as 24-1059
Petitioner:
SERGEI CHEPILKO
Defendant:
Police Officer SCOTT HENRY, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Sergeant TARAKUR CHOWDHURY and others
Antar v. Grogins
as 24-910
Plaintiff:
THEODORA F. ANTAR, Individually and as next friend and legal guardian of her minor child A.L. and J.V.
Defendant:
Honorable Judge AUDEN GROGINS, Individually and officially, Honorable Judge SCOTT JONES, Individually and officially, Honorable Judge JANE KUPSON GROSSMAN, individually and officially and others
Encarnacion v. Collado
as 24-911
Defendant:
VITARIUS, C.O.; Shawangunk Correctional Facility, Vitarious, OLIVO, C.O.; Shawangunk Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
BERNABE ENCARNACION
Bradshaw v. Annucci
as 24-819
Defendant:
GRAVELL, Mental Health Therapist, Upstate Correctional Facility, UHLER, Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility, R. CANTWELL, Commissioner Hearing Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
JAY BRADSHAW
Burrell v. Mason
as 24-737
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
BRYAN D. MASON, Sergeant; Clinton Correctional Facility, C.O. GORDON, Clinton Correctional Facility, C.O. DEYO, Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Burrell v. Bishop
as 24-717
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
BISHOP, Deputy Security, Sergeant LOCKE, Sergeant CONTO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
