Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Copeland v. Inch et al
as 5:2020cv00580
Plaintiff: Shannon Copeland
Defendant: Mark Inch, Richard Swearingen, Attorney General William Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copeland v. Wray et al
as 1:2020cv20466
Plaintiff: Shannon Copeland
Defendant: Ashley Moody, Richard Swearingen, Ocala Sheriff FNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copeland v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2020cv14028
Plaintiff: Shannon Copeland
Defendant: Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Copeland v. Rossitter et al
as 5:2019cv00662
Plaintiff: Shannon Copeland
Defendant: FNU Rossitter, Mark Inch, FNU Rossin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copeland v. Cruger et al
as 5:2019cv00172
Defendant: FNU Graff, FNU Riviera, FNU Madison and others
Plaintiff: Shannon Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copeland v. Jones et al
as 1:2018cv24940
Plaintiff: Shannon Copeland
Defendant: Director Christopher Wray, U.S. Attorney General, Katherine Fernandez-Rundle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shannon Copeland v. FNU Santucci, et al
as 18-13345
Plaintiff - Appellant: SHANNON COPELAND
Defendant - Appellee: FNU SANTUCCI, Sergeant, OFFICER HAYWOOD, EFFIE TRANCHESE, Officer and others
Shannon Copeland v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-13161
Petitioner - Appellant: SHANNON COPELAND
Respondent - Appellee: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Copeland v. Jones
as 5:2018cv00366
Plaintiff: Shannon Copeland
Defendant: Julie Jones, FNU Fonde, Michelle Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copeland v. Jones et al
as 5:2018cv00286
Plaintiff: Shannon Copeland
Defendant: Julie Jones, FNU Riedl, FNU Southerland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?