Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Allen v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
Shannon Marie Allen
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Schaff v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Shannon Marie Schaff
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Schaffer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00781
Plaintiff:
Shannon Marie Schaffer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Murray v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00772
Plaintiff:
Shannon Marie Murray
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tears v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01524
Plaintiff:
Shannon Tears and Shannon Marie Tears
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gaston et al v. Islamic Republic Of Iran
as 1:2018cv12337
Plaintiff:
Christian Blom, Andrew Canonico, Bernadette Montalvo and others
Defendant:
Islamic Rebuplic Of Iran and Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi
Gaston et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12338
Plaintiff:
Christian Blom, Andrew Canonico, Tamia Howard and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
IN RE DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP OVERTIME LITIGATION
as 1:2011cv02461
Defendant:
Deloitte LLP, Deloitte & Touche LLP and Deloitte & Touche USA LLP
Plaintiff:
Dina Z. Gersten, Bani Wirk, Daniel R. Rossillon and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Jason James
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Nicholas Mues
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Krieger et al v. Merck & Co., Inc.
as 1:2008cv04540
Plaintiff:
Lydia Sue Krieger, Lydia Sue Krieger, John Krieger and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
