Cases 61 - 70 of 129
Jerry Hooks v. Bruce Bannister, et al
as 14-15476
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY HOOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE R. BANNISTER, RONALD BRYANT, HAROLD BYRNE and others
Sheppard v. Foster et al
as 3:2014cv00059
Respondent:
Sheryl Foster and Nevada Attorney General
Unknown:
Catherine Cortez-Masto
Petitioner:
Melonie Lynn Sheppard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Williams et al
as 2:2013cv02339
Defendant:
Robert Bannister, Greg Cox, Cheryl Dressler and others
Plaintiff:
Tarz Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milagros Suratos v. Sheryl Foster, et al
as 13-16595
Petitioner - Appellant:
MILAGROS RAYRAY SURATOS
Respondent - Appellee:
SHERYL FOSTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Friedman v. Adams et al
as 2:2013cv01346
Defendant:
Catherine Cortez-Masto, James Cox, Craft and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Friedman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Friedman v. Adams et al
as 2:2013cv01345
Defendant:
Linda Adams, R.B. Bannister, Catherine Cortez-Masto and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Friedman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saintal v. Foster et al
as 2:2013cv01295
Respondent:
Sheryl Foster
Petitioner:
Priscella R. Saintal
Defendant:
State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saintal v. Cox et al
as 2:2013cv01293
Defendant:
James C Cox, Sheryl Foster, Dr. Jim Holmes and others
Plaintiff:
Priscella Saintal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saintal v. Cox et al
as 2:2013cv01084
Defendant:
James C. Cox, Sheryl Foster, Dr. Jim Holmes and others
Plaintiff:
Priscella R. Saintal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
England v. Foster et al
as 3:2013cv00188
Plaintiff:
William England
Defendant:
Sheryl Foster, Shannon Moyle, James Stogner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
