Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Armstrong v. National Shipping Company of Saudi Arabia, et al
as 4:2015cv00868
Plaintiff:
Jordan Armstrong
Defendant:
National Shipping Company of Saudi Arabia , JBH Worldwide, LLC , Shippers Stevedoring Company and others
Cross_claimant:
Ironplanet, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Reem Heavy Equipment Limitee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Nippon Steel Trading America, Inc., et al v. Shippers Stevedoring Company et al
as 4:2012cv00499
Plaintiff:
Nippon Steel Trading America, Inc. and Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. (U.S. Branch)
Defendant:
Shippers Stevedoring Company and Ceres Gulf, Inc.
Cross_claimant:
Shippers Stevedoring Company
Cross_defendant:
Ceres Gulf, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pullings v. Shippers Stevedoring Company et al
as 4:2011cv00679
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Pullings
Defendant:
Shippers Stevedoring Company , Dalomar Shippng and M/V DANOS Z
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Turner v Suzlon Wind Energy Corporation
as 3:2007cv00185
Plaintiff:
Thomas Turner, II and Thomas Turner, II
Defendant:
Suzlon Wind Energy Corporation and Suzlon Wind Energy Corporation
Intervenor:
Shippers Stevedoring Company
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
NSCSA (America), Inc. v. Shippers Stevedoring Company et al
as 4:2007cv00324
Plaintiff:
NSCSA (America), Inc.
Defendant:
Shippers Stevedoring Company, Biehl & Co., L.P., DHL Global Forwarding and others
Cross Claimant:
Biehl & Co., L.P., Halliburton Energy Services, Shippers Stevedoring Company and others
Cross Defendant:
Shippers Stevedoring Company, Shippers Stevedoring Company, Biehl & Co., L.P. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Shippers Stevedoring Company, DHL Global Forwarding and Biehl & Co., L.P.
Third Party Defendant:
Dixie Box & Crating of Texas, Inc., Dixie Box & Crating of Texas, Inc. and Dixie Box & Crating of Texas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
