Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Shulruff Dental, Inc. v. Ashtel Studios, Inc. d/b/a SmartCare et al
as 1:2022cv07184
Plaintiff:
Shulruff Dental, Inc.
Defendant:
Ashtel Studios, Inc. d/b/a SmartCare, Anish K. Patel and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Shulruff Dental, Inc. v. Trojan Professional Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06766
Plaintiff:
Shulruff Dental, Inc.
Defendant:
Trojan Professional Services, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Shulruff Dental, Inc. v. Handpiece Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06725
Plaintiff:
Shulruff Dental, Inc.
Defendant:
Handpiece Solutions, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Shulruff Dental, Inc. v. Advanced Health Communications, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2022cv06711
Plaintiff:
Shulruff Dental, Inc.
Defendant:
Advanced Health Communications, L.L.C. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Shulruff Dental, Inc. v. Parnell Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
Shulruff Dental, Inc.
Defendant:
Parnell Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and John Does,1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Shulruff Dental Inc. v. Integrated Charts Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00879
Defendant:
John Does 1-10 and Integrated Charts, Inc. doing business as Tab 32
Plaintiff:
Shulruff Dental Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Davis Neurology, P.A. v. Dental Equities, LLC, d/b/a Peer United et al
as 1:2017cv01777
Plaintiff:
Davis Neurology, P.A.
Defendant:
Dental Equities, LLC, d/b/a Peer United, First Arkansas Bank & Trust and John Does 1 - 10
Movant:
Affiliated Health Care Associates, P.C. , Chicago Chiropractic & Sports Injury Center, LTD , Dr. Robert Gerber and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
