Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Jeton Lita/Simon Bolivar Express Trust v. Calhoun et al
as 2:2024cv02714
Plaintiff:
Jeton Lita/Simon Bolivar Express Trust
Defendant:
Brad C. Calhoun, Teachers Federal Credit Union, Timothy M. Southerton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02684
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv08084
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Robinson (Allen)
as 21-1865
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ronald Robinson, AKA Gutta, AKA Peoples, Kenneth McGriff, AKA Supreme, AKA Preme, AKA Rick Coleman, AKA Kevin Long, AKA John Simms, AKA Lee Tuten, Dennis Crosby, AKA Howbout, AKA Divine and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Russell Allen
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv03691
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
