Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 60
Rizzo v. Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv05313
Defendant: Applied Optoelectronics, Inc., Chih-Hsiang (Thompson) Lin and Stefan J. Murry
Movant: Philip R. Deubler, Jr., Lawrence Rougier and Daniel Sisto
Plaintiff: Gianluca Rizzo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Terrell Cross v. D. Sisto
as 17-72195
Petitioner: TERRELL CROSS
Respondent: D. K. SISTO, Warden
USA v. Delfino Sisto We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-50405
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DELFINO JESUS SISTOS
Vester Patterson v. USDC-CALA
as 16-73732
: In re: VESTER L. PATTERSON
Petitioner: VESTER L. PATTERSON
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest: D. K. SISTO, Warden
USA v. Rex Sisto We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-11269
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: REX SISTOS
USA v. Sisto Bernal We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2892
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: SISTO BERNAL
Ontarious Mack, Sr. v. USDC-CALA
as 13-72237
: In re: ONTARIOUS DAQUAN MACK, Sr.
Petitioner: ONTARIOUS DAQUAN MACK, Sr.
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest: D. K. SISTO, Warden
Sistos v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-14160
Plaintiff: Linda Sistos
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Alfred Laws v. D. Sisto
as 12-70809
Petitioner: ALFRED LAWS
Respondent: D. K. SISTO, Warden
Vester Patterson v. USDC-CALA
as 12-70760
: In re: VESTER L. PATTERSON
Petitioner: VESTER L. PATTERSON
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest: D. K. SISTO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?