Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Smith v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv03118
Plaintiff:
Crystal Smith
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Wilkins-Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv03010
Plaintiff:
Ruby Lee Wilkins-Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Willie J. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. O'Malley
as 1:2023cv17155
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Smith
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Smith v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv14719
Plaintiff:
Emily L. Smith
Defendant:
Comm'r of SSA Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Smith v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv04431
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Smith
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2022cv04184
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv06947
Plaintiff:
Shantel S. Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Mitsuuchi-Smith v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv06777
Plaintiff:
Edie Mitsuuchi-Smith
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Smith v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv06207
Plaintiff:
Leslie J. Smith
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
