Cases 11 - 20 of 96
JONES v. PRINCE JONES SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST et al
as 1:2021mc00056
Petitioner:
PRINCE EDWARD M. JONES
Respondent:
PRINCE JONES SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST and PRINCE EDWARD JONES
Williams Davis v. DOS, et al
as 21-5013
Defendant / Appellee:
The Passport Office of the United States Department of State, United States Marshal Service, United States Secret Service and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Williams Scott Davis, Jr.
Sherry Dow v. Debbie Stabenow, et al
as 21-5005
Defendant / Appellee:
Fairchild Airforce Base, Central Intelligence Agency, United Nations and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sherry Lynn Dow
William Turnbull, et al v. SSA, et al
as 20-5365
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William Tran, David Cohen, Helen Witts and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew Saul, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Social Security Administration
Brud Rossmann v. SSA
as 20-5296
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brud Rossmann
Defendant / Appellee:
Social Security Administration
David Wattleton v. Nancy Berryhill
as 20-5084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant / Appellee:
Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
UMASS MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. et al v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv03211
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER HOSPITAL and UMASS MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC.
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552
Tamala McCrea v. Social Security Commissioner
as 19-5266
Defendant / Appellee:
Social Security Commissioner
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tamala McCrea
Ricardo Calderon Lopez v. Andrew Saul
as 19-5242
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ricardo Jose Calderon Lopez
Terrence Blackman v. SSA
as 19-5244
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Terrence Butchallah Blackman
Defendant / Appellee:
Social Security Administration
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
