Cases 11 - 20 of 47
CAMPBELL v. SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv80239
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CAMPBELL
Defendant:
SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY and DULUTH, SOUTH SHORE AND ATLANTIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
TRAXLER v. SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY
as 2:2009cv70117
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TRAXLER
Defendant:
SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUNLAP v. SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY
as 2:2009cv67416
Plaintiff:
MARVIN DUNLAP
Defendant:
SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BOYD v. SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY
as 2:2009cv67426
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BOYD
Defendant:
SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BOYD v. SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY
as 2:2009cv67429
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BOYD
Defendant:
SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SCANLAN v. SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY
as 2:2009cv67417
Plaintiff:
JOHN SCANLAN
Defendant:
SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BOYD v. SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY
as 2:2009cv67428
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BOYD
Defendant:
SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BOYD v. SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY
as 2:2009cv67427
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BOYD
Defendant:
SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BOYD v. SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY
as 2:2009cv67425
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BOYD
Defendant:
SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
GUREWITZ v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66069
Plaintiff:
MARVIN GUREWITZ
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., ALLPAX, INC., ANCHOR BRAKE SHOE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
