Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Ruffa v. Southern California Edison Company
as 1:2022cv01556
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lyle Ruffa
Defendant:
Southern California Edison Company, Edison International, EIX Benefits Connection and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Roberto Mejia v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01311
Defendant:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. and Southern California Edison Company Long-Term Disability Plan
Plaintiff:
Roberto Mejia
Cross Claimant:
Southern California Edison Company and Southern California Edison Company Benefits Committee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Sutton et al v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
as 3:2011cv00098
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sutton and Joshua Johnson
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America , Sempra Energy Group Health and Welfare Program, Sempra Energy, and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Glenn Tibble, et al v. Edison International, et al
as 10-56415
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GLENN TIBBLE, as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the Plan, WILLIAM BAUER, as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the Plan, WILLIAM IZRAL, as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the Plan and others
Defendant - Appellant:
EDISON INTERNATIONAL, THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON BENEFITS COMMITTEE, incorrectly named The Edison International Benefits Committee, EDISON INTERNATIONAL TRUST INVESTMENT COMMITTEE and others
Janet Younkin v. Southern California Edison Company et al
as 8:2008cv00869
Plaintiff:
Janet Younkin and Janet Younkin
Defendant:
Southern California Edison Company, The Southern California Edison Company Retirement Plan, The Southern California Edison Company Benefits Administration and Compliance and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
