Cases 11 - 17 of 17
GREEN et al v. MEDTRONIC INC
as 2:2007cv01422
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM G. GREEN, WILLIAM G. GREEN, WILLIAM G. GREEN and others
Defendant:
MEDTRONIC INC, MEDTRONIC INC, MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BAKUN et al v. BIOMEDICAL TISSUE SERVICES LTD.
as 2:2007cv00890
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. BAKUN, MICHAEL J. BAKUN, MICHAEL J. BAKUN and others
Defendant:
BIOMEDICAL TISSUE SERVICES LTD., BIOMEDICAL TISSSUE SERVICES, LTD., REGENERATION TECHNOLOGIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
YATES et al v. REGENERATION TECHNOLOGIES INC
as 2:2007cv00302
Plaintiff:
CAROL G. YATES and CAROL G. YATES
Defendant:
REGENERATION TECHNOLOGIES INC, BIOMEDICAL TISSUE SERVICES LTD., SPINALGRAFT TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HAGENA v. MEDTRONIC INC
as 2:2007cv00304
Plaintiff:
CARLA R. HAGENA and CARLA R. HAGENA
Defendant:
MEDTRONIC INC, MEDTRONIC INC, MEDTRONIC INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DAVIS et al v. MASTROMARINO
as 2:2007cv00297
Plaintiff:
CAROLYNE DAVIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL MASTROMARINO, BIOMEDICAL TISSUE SERVICES, LTD., MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BOWERS et al v. REGENERATION TECHNOLOGIES INC
as 2:2007cv00301
Plaintiff:
JUDY G. BOWERS and JUDY G. BOWERS
Defendant:
REGENERATION TECHNOLOGIES INC, BIOMEDICAL TISSUE SERVICES LTD., SPINALGRAFT TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HOLLANDS et al v. REGENERATION TECHNOLOGIES INC
as 2:2007cv00303
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. HOLLANDS and JAMES E. HOLLANDS
Defendant:
REGENERATION TECHNOLOGIES INC, REGENERATION TECHNOLOGIES INC, BIOMEDICAL TISSUE SERVICES LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
