Cases 1 - 8 of 8
D'Ooge v. Spirit Commercial Auto Risk Retention Group, Inc., et al
as 2:2018cv09375
Defendant:
Spirit Commercial Auto Risk Retention Group, Inc., Gerardo Gomez and Happy Transportation, LLC
Plaintiff:
Charlotte D'ooge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnett et al v. Spirit Commercial Auto Risk Retention Group Inc et al
as 5:2018cv01254
Plaintiff:
Brandon Barnett and Shemethia Ray Barnett
Defendant:
SMT Trucking, Inc., Spirit Commercial Auto Risk Retention Group Inc, Mike Frederick Bwondara and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murcia et al v. Spirit Commercial Auto Risk Retention Group, Inc, et al
as 2:2018cv04938
Plaintiff:
Walter Alexander Murcia , Walter Murcia and Harley Curtis
Defendant:
Spirit Commercial Auto Risk Retention Group, Inc. , WJ Express, Inc. and Kent Orr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Kamanzi et al
as 6:2018cv00004
Defendant:
John B Kamanzi, Moon Star Transport L L C and Spirit Commercial Auto Risk Retention Group Inc
Plaintiff:
Tom Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cornin v. Schindler, et al
as 2:2017cv05208
Plaintiff:
Kelley Cornin
Defendant:
Philip Schindler, Dejan Carrier, Inc. and Spirit Commercial Auto Risk Retention Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zewen v. Lomidze et al
as 2:2017cv00044
Plaintiff:
Edward Zewen
Defendant:
Nariman A. Lomidze, S&M Logistics LLC and Spirit Commercial Auto Risk Retention Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phoenix v. Spirit Commercial Auto Risk Retention Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06542
Plaintiff:
Cindy Phoenix
Defendant:
Spirit Commercial Auto Risk Retention Group, Inc., 3W Express, Inc. and Rafael Pittaluga Arguelles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen v. Story Logistics et al
as 5:2016cv00485
Plaintiff:
Rubbie Allen
Defendant:
Story Logistics , Nicholas Gitau and Spirit Commercial Auto Risk Retention Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
