Cases 1 - 10 of 57
City of Colorado Springs, et al v. TSA, et al
as 23-1328
Petitioner:
City of Colorado Springs and Milwaukee County
Respondent:
Transportation Security Administration and David P. Pekoske, Administrator
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Delek US Holdings, Inc., et al v. EPA
as 22-1181
Petitioner:
Delek US Holdings, Inc., Lion Oil Company, LLC, Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc. and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
National Corn Growers Association
Delek US Holdings, Inc., et al v. EPA
as 22-1100
Petitioner:
Delek US Holdings, Inc., Lion Oil Company, LLC, Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc. and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
National Corn Growers Association
West Flagler Associates, Ltd., et al v. DOI, et al
as 22-5022
Plaintiff / Appellee:
West Flagler Associates, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership, doing business as Magic City Casino and Bonita-Fort Myers Corporation, a Florida Corporation, doing business as Bonita Springs Poker Room
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Department of the Interior and Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior
West Flagler Associates, Ltd., et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 21-5265
Plaintiff / Appellee:
West Flagler Associates, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership, doing business as Magic City Casino and Bonita-Fort Myers Corporation, a Florida Corporation, doing business as Bonita Springs Poker Room
Defendant / Appellee:
Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior and United States Department of the Interior
Petitioner / Appellant:
Seminole Tribe of Florida
Amicus Curiae:
Monterra MF, LLC, Armando Codina, James Carr and others
WEST FLAGLER ASSOCIATES, LTD. et al v. HAALAND et al
as 1:2021cv02192
Plaintiff:
WEST FLAGLER ASSOCIATES, LTD. a Florida Limited Partnership d/b/a MAGIC CITY CASINO, BONITA-FORT MYERS CORPORATION a Florida Corporation d/b/a BONITA SPRINGS POKER ROOM, WEST FLAGLER ASSOCIATES, LTD. a Florida Limited Partnership doing business as MAGIC CITY CASINO and others
Defendant:
DEB HAALAND and DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Petitioner:
SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
SPRINGS et al. v. BRAITHWAITE et al.
as 1:2020cv03244
Defendant:
KENNETH J. BRAITHWAITE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
KENNETH SPRINGS and NATHANIEL REESE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
District Hospital Partners, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 20-5222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UHS-Corona, Inc., doing business as Corona Regional Medical Center, Lancaster Hospital Corporation, doing business as Lancaster Community Hospital, UHS of Oklahoma, Inc., doing business as St. Mary's Regional Medical Center and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
Lee Memorial Hospital, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 20-5085
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lee Memorial Hospital, University of Colorado Health at Memorial Hospital, formerly known as Memorial Health System Colorado Springs, Gulf Coast Medical Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Allina Health, 13cv775 ; 13cv776, for the benefit of Abbott Northwestern Hospital, for the benefit of Mercy Hospital, for the benefit of Owatonna Hospital, for the benefit of St. Francis Regional Medical Center, for the benefit of Buffalo Hospital, f, Banner Health, for the benefit of North Colorado Medical Center, for the benefit of Banner Gateway Medical Center, for the benefit of Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center, for the benefit of Banner Thunderbird Medical Center, for the benefit of Banne, Billings Clinic and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
