Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 28
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv02232
Plaintiff: STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF KANSAS and others
Defendant: SOFTBANK GROUP CORP., T-MOBILE US, INC., DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG and others
Amicus Curiae: NEW AMERICA'S OPEN TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE, HAL SINGER, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Petitioner: NTCH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
IN RE APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR 2703(d) ORDER FOR ONE PHONE NUMBER SERVICED BY SPRINT CORPORATION
as 1:2021ml00876
In Re: IN RE APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR 2703(d) ORDER FOR ONE PHONE NUMBER SERVICED BY SPRINT CORPORATION
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. THE SEARCH OF INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH THE CELLULAR TELEPHONE ASSIGNED CALL NUMBER (301) 586-2431, THAT IS STORED AT PREMISES CONTROLLED BY SPRINT CORPORATION et al
as 1:2020sc00590
Defendant: THE SEARCH OF INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH THE CELLULAR TELEPHONE ASSIGNED CALL NUMBER (301) 586-2431, THAT IS STORED AT PREMISES CONTROLLED BY SPRINT CORPORATION
Plaintiff: UNTIED STATES OF AMERICA
MOBILE NOW, INC. v. SPRINT CORPORATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00918
Defendant: SPRINT CORPORATION and SPRINT CORPORATION doing business as SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC.
Plaintiff: MOBILE NOW, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ad Hoc Telecommunications, et al v. FCC, et al
as 17-1153
Petitioner: Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee, BT Americas, Inc., Granite Telecommunications, LLC and others
Respondent: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Sprint Corporation, et al v. FCC, et al
as 17-1126
Petitioner: Sprint Corporation and Windstream Services, LLC
Respondent: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: AT&T, Inc. and AT&T Services, Inc.
SPRINT CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01972
Plaintiff: SPRINT CORPORATION
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, SALLY JEWELL, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
US Telecom Assn, et al v. FCC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 03-1414
Petitioner: United States Telecom Association and CenturyTel, Inc.
Respondent: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Respondent: Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association, Sprint Corporation and National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners
Intervenor: T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Intervenor For Petitioner: Central Texas Telephone Cooperative, Inc., The Champaign Telephone Company, Chariton Valley Telephone Corporation and others
Ctrl TX Tele Coop, et al v. FCC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 03-1405
Petitioner: Central Texas Telephone Cooperative, Inc., Kaplan Telephone Company, Inc., Leaco Rural Telephone Cooperative, Inc. and others
Respondent: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Respondent: National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners and Sprint Corporation
AT&T Corp v. FCC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 03-1017
Petitioner: AT&T Corporation
Respondent: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Petitioner: WorldCom Inc. and Sprint Corporation
Intervenor: Contel of the South, Inc., doing business as Verizon Mid-States, GTE Midwest Incorporated, doing business as Verizon Midwest, GTE Southwest Incorporated, doing business as Verizon Southwest and others
Intervenor For Respondent: BellSouth Public Communications, Inc. and SBC Communications Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?