Cases 1 - 7 of 7
5K LOGISTICS, INC. v. ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE CO. et al
as 2:2011cv03484
Plaintiff:
5K LOGISTICS, INC.
Defendant:
ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE CO. and EAGLE UNDERWRITING GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE CO. v. PRIMAVERA SOFTWARE, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv03908
Plaintiff:
ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE CO.
Defendant:
PRIMAVERA SOFTWARE, INC., JOHN V. WILBURN, DONNA HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
HARRIS et al v. BELL ASBESTOS MINES, LTD. et al
as 2:2007cv73936
Plaintiff:
FANNIE MAE HARRIS, GREGORY HARRIS, DARRELL HARRIS and others
Defendant:
BELL ASBESTOS MINES, LTD., UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, GAF CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PETES et al v. BELL ASBESTOS MINES, LTD. et al
as 2:2007cv73950
Plaintiff:
ELTON PETES, ELTON PETES, EMELDA PETES and others
Defendant:
BELL ASBESTOS MINES, LTD., UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, GAF CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LEWIS et al v. BELL ASBESTOS MINES, LTD. et al
as 2:2007cv73935
Plaintiff:
YVONNE LEWIS, GINA LEWIS and JAMES LEWIS
Defendant:
BELL ASBESTOS MINES, LTD., UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, GAF CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BARNES et al v. BELL ASBESTOS MINES, LTD. et al
as 2:2007cv73934
Plaintiff:
LUCY BARNES, LUCY BARNES, WILLIAM BARNES, JR and others
Defendant:
BELL ASBESTOS MINES, LTD., UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, GAF CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE CO. v. SAMOYLO
as 2:2007cv01989
Plaintiff:
ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE CO.
Defendant:
PATRICK SAMOYLO and EMILY DRAVES-SAMOYLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
