Cases 31 - 40 of 75
GAITER et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 0:2016cv62755
Plaintiff:
Tony Gaiter , Sedrick Irvin , KEVIN HARRIS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, MINNESOTA VIKINGS FOOTBALL CLUB, LLC, MIAMI DOLPHINS, LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
St. Louis v. Aetna Health Inc.
as 6:2016cv01922
Plaintiff:
Philip St. Louis
Defendant:
Aetna Health Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
In re: Jeffrey St. Louis
as 16-14906
Petitioner:
In re: JEFFREY ST. LOUIS
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
St. Louis v. United States Of America
as 0:2016cv61420
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey St. Louis
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: Jeffrey St. Louis
as 16-13812
Petitioner:
In re: JEFFREY ST. LOUIS
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
St. Louis v. United States of America
as 0:2016cv61342
Petitioner:
Jeffrey St. Louis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: Jeffrey St. Louis
as 16-13685
Petitioner:
In re: JEFFREY ST. LOUIS
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re Home Loan Servicing Solutions, Ltd. Securities Litigation
as 0:2016cv60165
Plaintiff:
Adam Oliveira , West Palm Beach Police Pension Fund , The City of Fort Lauderdale Police and Firefighters' Retirement System and others
Defendant:
Home Loan Servicing Solutions, Ltd. , William C. Erbey , John P. Van Vlack and others
Movant:
Chris Sharp , David Rattner and District No. 9, I.A. of M. & A.W. Pension Trust
Consol_plaintiff:
Norvell Berglan and West Palm Beach Police Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Jeffrey St. Louis v. USA
as 15-15637
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFREY ST. LOUIS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Jeffrey St. Louis
as 15-15638
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JEFFREY ST. LOUIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
