Cases 11 - 14 of 14
St. Regis Mohawk Tribe v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 7:2008cv00208
Plaintiff:
St. Regis Mohawk Tribe and St. Regis Mohawk Tribe
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, Dirk Kempthorne, James E Cason and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
ST. REGIS MOHAWK TRIBE OF NEW YORK v. KEMPTHORNE
as 1:2007cv01958
Plaintiff:
ST. REGIS MOHAWK TRIBE OF NEW YORK
Defendant:
DIRK KEMPTHORNE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Catskill Development, et al v. Park Pl. Entertainme
as 7:2000cv08660
Plaintiff:
Catskill Development, L.L.C.,, Mohawk Management, L.L.C.,, Monticello Raceway Development Company, L.L.C., and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Paul Debary and Joseph Bernstein
Petitioner:
St. Regis Mohawk Tribe
Defendant:
Park Place Entertainment Corporation,
Consolidated Defendant:
Harrah's Operating Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ct Diversity-(Citizenship)
Canadian St. Regis, et al v. State of New York, et al
as 5:1982cv00783
Plaintiff:
Canadian St. Regis Band of Mohawk Indians
Defendant:
State of New York , Mario Cuomo , County of St. Lawrence, NY and others
Consol_plaintiff:
St. Regis Mohawk Tribe and People of the Longhouse at Akwesasne
Consol_defendant:
Power Authority of the State of New York , Key Bank of North New York, N.A. , William J. Brockway and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
United States of America
Intervenor_defendant:
Canadian National Railways , Walsh Realty Corp. , Marine Midland Properties Corp. and others
Counter_claimant:
State of New York , Canadian National Railways , Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation and others
Counter_defendant:
United States of America, People of the Longhouse at Akwesasne , St. Regis Mohawk Tribe and others
Movant:
Mowhawk Council of Kahnawa';ke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1362
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
