Cases 1 - 8 of 8
In Re: Procter & Gamble Aerosol Products Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
as 2:2022md03025
In Re:
In Re: Proctor & Gamble Aerosol Products Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation and In Re: Procter & Gamble Aerosol Products Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
Plaintiff:
Erik Velasques, Frank Ortega, Matthew Lopez and others
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Stanfield v. C.R. BARD INC et al
as 2:2020cv02765
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. BARD INC
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stanfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stanfield v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00724
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sheila Stanfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams et al v. Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
as 1:2018cv00475
Plaintiff:
Arlene Fait, Caidan Bailey, Christopher Atwood and others
Defendant:
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Atwood et al v. UC Health et al
as 1:2016cv00593
Plaintiff:
Christopher Atwood , Rebekah Brady , Jennifer Hickey and others
Defendant:
UC Health , West Chester Hospital, LLC , Abubakar Atiq Durrani, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Atwood et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00483
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Atwood , Joshua Ault , Gayle Bachmann and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stanfield et al v. DePuy Orthopedics Inc et al
as 1:2014dp20031
Plaintiff:
William E. Stanfield and Diane Stanfield
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stanfield et al v. Lincoln Electric Company et al
as 1:2008wf17511
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Stanfield and Peggy Stanfield
Defendant:
Lincoln Electric Company, Hobart Brothers Company, Illinois Tool Works, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
