Cases 1 - 8 of 8
James Perez v. Staples Contract & Commercial
as 21-2601
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES L. PEREZ
Defendant / Appellee:
STAPLES CONTRACT & COMMERCIAL LLC, doing business as Staples, Inc.
Gamble v. Staples, Inc.
as 1:2020cv02474
Defendant:
Staples, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Zacharia Gamble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Staples v. Meredith Corp.
as 1:2016cv01919
Movant:
Staples, Inc.
Respondent:
Meredith Corp.
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission , District Of Columbia and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Defendant:
Staples, Inc. and Office Depot, Inc.
Claimant:
John Doe , Amazon.Com, Inc. , American Automobile Association (Inc.) and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Federal Trade Commission v. Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv00839
Respondent:
Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission , Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and District of Columbia
Defendant:
Staples, Inc. and Office Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Lim v. Walker et al
as 1:2012cv06925
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Scott Walker, John J. McAlary, Diane F. Bosse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lim v. Staples Inc et al
as 2:2011cv00866
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Staples Inc, Bank Mutual Corporation, Microsoft Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1971
Plath v. Staples, Inc.
as 1:2009cv02898
Plaintiff:
Christopher Plath, Christopher Plath and Christopher Plath
Defendant:
Staples, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Competitive Edge, Inc. et al v. Staples, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00956
Plaintiff:
Competitive Edge, Inc., Competitive Edge, Inc., Competitive Edge, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Staples, Inc. and Staples The Office Superstore East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
