Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Hundal v. Islas, et al.
as 24-2303
Plaintiff:
GURKIRN HUNDAL
Defendant:
RUBEN ISLAS, JR., MARTHA ISLAS ENRIQUEZ, JOE ZUNIGA and others
Cable v. Starbucks Corporation
as 24-914
Plaintiff:
GEORGE CABLE, an individual
Defendant:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas et al
as 2:2023cv10203
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Defendant:
Ruben Islas, Marth Enriquez, Jules Arthur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Douglas Troester v. Starbucks Corporation, et al
as 20-80032
Respondent:
DOES, 1-50 inclusive and STARBUCKS CORPORATION, Washington corporation
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS TROESTER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Dwain Lammey v. Starbucks Corporation, et al
as 19-55876
Defendant / Appellee:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation and DOES, 1-10
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DWAIN LAMMEY
Shirley Lindsay v. Starbucks Corporation, et al
as 19-55738
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHIRLEY LINDSAY
Defendant / Appellee:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation
Defendant:
OVERLAND PARTNERS SEPULVEDA, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company
Nehemiah Kong v. Mana Investment Company, LLC, et al
as 19-55577
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NEHEMIAH KONG
Defendant / Appellee:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation
Defendant:
MANA INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company
Scott Johnson v. Starbucks Corporation
as 19-15759
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a Washington corporation
Dwain Lammey v. Starbucks Corporation, et al
as 19-55157
Defendant / Appellee:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation and DOES, 1-10
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DWAIN LAMMEY
Larry Singer v. Metro Pointe Retail Associates II et al
as 8:2018cv00869
Defendant:
Does, MPRA II GP, LLC, Metro Pointe Retail Associates II and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Singer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
