Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Santos et al v. Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Elisabete Santos and Luiz Santos
Defendant:
Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc. and Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Darnell v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2022cv01268
Plaintiff:
Steven J Darnell
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Wells v. Starbucks Corporation
as 3:2020cv00547
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Wells
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv01477
Plaintiff:
Mr. Thomas Brown and Thomas Brown
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation, Hunter Capitulo, Starbucks Corporation doing business as Starbucks Coffee Company doing business as Starbucks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kestler v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2019cv00290
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Kestler
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Workneh v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2019cv00565
Plaintiff:
Aynalem G. Workneh
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ealy v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2017cv02008
Plaintiff:
Anta Marie Ealy
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Pasinger v. Starbucks Corporation aka Starbucks Coffee Company et al
as 3:2007cv00452
Plaintiff:
Thomas Pasinger and Thomas Pasinger
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation aka Starbucks Coffee Company, Rich Soderberg, Dorothy Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Henson v. Starbucks, et al
as 3:2007cv00368
Plaintiff:
Brittany Henson
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation aka Starbucks Coffee Company and Starbucks Corporation aka Starbucks Coffee Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
