Cases 31 - 40 of 18,365
State of Oklahoma, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1125
Petitioner:
State of Oklahoma, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Chelmowski v. United States Environment Protection Agency, The
as 1:2024cv01336
Plaintiff:
JAMES CHELMOWSKI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
State of North Dakota, et al v. EPA
as 24-1119
Petitioner:
State of North Dakota, State of West Virginia, State of Alaska and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
American Petroleum Institute v. EPA, et al
as 24-1116
Petitioner:
American Petroleum Institute
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
American Exploration & Production Council v. EPA, et al
as 24-1117
Petitioner:
American Exploration & Production Council
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
USA v. Isreal Easterday
as 24-3053
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Isreal Easterday, also known as Isreal Easterday
USA v. Felipe Martinez
as 24-3052
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Felipe Antonio Martinez, also known as Tony
Fida Mustafa Chohan v. DOS
as 24-5126
Plaintiff:
Fida Ul Mustafa Chohan
Defendant:
United States Department of State
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
