Cases 1 - 10 of 26
VISCONTI v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
as 1:2024cv00014
Defendant:
MAHA VISCONTI, MAHA EL PINTO-MAQADDEM, LALAMAHA REGRAGUIMOQADEM and others
Plaintiff:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VISCONTI v. SEPE et al
as 1:2023cv03202
Plaintiff:
MAHA VISCONTI
Defendant:
LOUIS SEPE, LACBA IDP, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHOVE v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 1:2023cv00067
Petitioner:
THEODORE SHOVE
Respondent:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA and U.S. DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SHOVE v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
as 1:2022cv00288
Petitioner:
THEODORE SHOVE
Respondent:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SHOVE v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 1:2021cv01563
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT AND COURT OF APPEALS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Plaintiff:
THEODORE SHOVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
as 1:2017cv00076
Plaintiff:
IVAN VALDEZ PEREZ
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STAPLETON v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
as 1:2014cv01748
Plaintiff:
LUTHER DARNELL STAPLETON, JR.
Defendant:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLINNER v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
as 1:2014cv01448
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FLINNER
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEBOSE v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
as 1:2014cv01446
Plaintiff:
DONALD R. DEBOSE, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAY v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 1:2014cv01379
Plaintiff:
KENNETH EARL GAY
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, EDMUND JERRY BROWN and KAMALA HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
