Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Commonwealth of Kentucky, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1087
Petitioner: Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of West Virginia, State of Alabama and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
State of Oklahoma, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1059
Petitioner: State of Oklahoma, State of West Virginia, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor: State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
Commonwealth of Kentucky, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1050
Petitioner: Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of West Virginia, State of Alabama and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
State of Oklahoma, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1043
Petitioner: State of Oklahoma, by and through its Attorney General, Gentner F. Drummond and Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, U.S. EPA
Amicus Curiae: Sierra Club, Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah, Center for Biological Diversity and others
USA, et al v. Google LLC
as 24-5006
Plaintiff: United States of America, State of Arkansas, State of Florida and others
Defendant: Google LLC
Other: Brad Greenspan
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1009
Petitioner: State of West Virginia, State of Oklahoma, State of Alabama and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
American Lung Association, et al v. EPA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1140
Respondent: Andrew Wheeler, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency and Jane Nishida, Acting Administrator
Petitioner: American Lung Association and American Public Health Association
Intervenor: State of Kansas, Phil Bryant, Governor of the State of Mississippi, State of Texas and others
Amicus Curiae: City of Portland, Debra A. Haaland, Michael Oppenheimer and others
State of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-1081
Petitioner: State of Ohio, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor: State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
Amicus Curiae: The Two Hundred for Housing Equity, Americans for Tax Reform, American Commitment and others
Not Yet Classified: ConservAmerica
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1399
Petitioner: State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor: Gulf Coast Lignite Coalition, Calpine Corporation, Lignite Energy Council and others
Amicus Curiae: Technological Innovation Experts, Nicholas Ashford, M. Granger Morgan, Edward S. Rubin, and Margaret Taylor, Carbon Capture and Storage Scientists, Roger Aines, Sally Benson, S. Julio Friedmann, Jon Gibbins, Raghubir Gupta, Howard Herzog, Susan Hovorka, Meagan Mauter, Ah-Hyung (Alissa) Park, Gary Rochelle and Jennifer Wilcox and Saskatchew Power Corporation
State of New York, et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-7078
Plaintiff / Appellant: State of New York, District of Columbia, State of California and others
Defendant / Appellee: Facebook, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.
Amicus Curiae: United States of America, American Antitrust Institute, Committee to Support the Antitrust Laws and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?