Cases 31 - 40 of 529
Rivera-Pierola v. Board of Regents for the Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical Colleges et al
as 5:2021cv00616
Defendant:
St Matthews University Inc, State of Oklahoma ex rel Oklahoma State University and Board of Regents for the Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical Colleges
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Rivera-Pierola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Gordon v. Crow et al
as 5:2021cv00571
Petitioner:
Joshua Daniel Albert Gordon
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma and Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thompson v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2021cv00572
Petitioner:
Christopher Thompson
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, FNU LNU and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bence v. Womble et al
as 5:2021cv00558
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Bence
Defendant:
Chris M Boring, Micheal Womble, Susan K Meinders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. State of Oklahoma
as 5:2021cv00405
Petitioner:
Robbie Dale Mitchell
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Pedigrew et al
as 5:2021cv00290
Petitioner:
Homer Jones
Respondent:
FNU Pedigrew and State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Whitehead v. Stephens County et al
as 5:2021cv00272
Respondent:
Stephens County and State of Oklahoma
Petitioner:
Ross Wayne Whitehead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Strawn v. Stephens County Court et al
as 5:2021cv00243
Petitioner:
Joseph Glen Strawn
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma and Stephens County Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Goodson v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2021cv00222
Petitioner:
Eric T Goodson
Respondent:
Jason Hicks and State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kirk v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2021cv00164
Respondent:
Jason Hicks and State of Oklahoma
Petitioner:
Shane Josiah Kirk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
