Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ronald Veteto v. Roy Hightower, et al
as 21-14126
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD D. VETETO
Defendant / Appellee:
ROY HIGHTOWER, Warden, in his individual and official capacity, W. G. POWELL, Deputy Warden, in his individual and official capacity, DAVID STILL, Supervisor, in his individual and official capacity and others
Sandra Reid v. Fraid Hakim, et al
as 20-10386
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGIA LIEBERT, ROBERT STILL and FRAID HAKIM
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SANDRA DENISE REID
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In re: Robert Still
as 16-12509
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT EUGENE STILL
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Franklin et al v. Success Trade, Inc. et al
as 1:2015mc21253
Petitioner:
Orlando Franklin and Devon Still
Respondent:
Success Trade, Inc., Success Trade Securities, Inc., BP Trade, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Motion to confirm arbitration award
Franklin et al v. Success Trade, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv21253
Plaintiff:
Orlando Franklin and Devon Still
Defendant:
Success Trade, Inc. , Success Trade Securities, Inc. , BP Trade, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
Still Wave LLC et al v. Holder et al
as 6:2013cv00152
Plaintiff:
Still Wave LLC and Gregorio H. Henriques
Defendant:
US Attorney General, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Director of the US Citizenship & Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
USA v. Lamarcus Stilling
as 12-10417
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LAMARCUS WALTHUGH STILLING
Arata et al v. BP America Production Company et al
as 1:2011cv00274
Defendant:
BP America Production Company , Parsons Corporation , Dennis Berg and others
Plaintiff:
John Arata , Southern Sports Fishing, Inc. , Larry Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
