Cases 1 - 7 of 7
CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION FOR HEALTH et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2020cv03485
Plaintiff:
WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP HOSPITAL DISTRICT doing business as WASHINGTON HOSPITAL, COUNTY OF KERN doing business as KERN MEDICAL CENTER, DIGNITY HEALTH doing business as ST. MARY'S MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, XAVIER BECERRA and NORRIS COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
ST. MARY MEDICAL CENTER et al v. THOMAS E. PRICE
as 1:2017cv01073
Plaintiff:
ST. MARY MEDICAL CENTER , ARROYO GRANDE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL , BAKERSFIELD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
THOMAS E. PRICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
MERCY GENERAL HOSPITAL et al v. BURWELL
as 1:2016cv00099
Plaintiff:
MERCY GENERAL HOSPITAL , ALEXIAN BROTHERS OF SAN JOSE, INC. , ANAHEIM MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
BOYD et al v. KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON, LLP
as 1:2014cv00889
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. BOYD, JR.
Defendant:
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON, LLP and DENNIS M. GINGOLD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LANNAN FOUNDATION v. GINGOLD et al
as 1:2013cv01090
Plaintiff:
LANNAN FOUNDATION
Defendant:
DENNIS M. GINGOLD and KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION et al v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al
as 1:2010cv00489
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION and UNITED STATES SUGAR CORPORATION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JO-ELLEN DARCY and STEVEN L. STOCKTON
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
NEW HOPE POWER COMPANY et al v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al
as 1:2009cv02413
Plaintiff:
NEW HOPE POWER COMPANY and OKEELANTA CORPORATION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and STEVEN L. STOCKTON
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
