Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Doctor's Associates LLC et al v. Khononov
as 1:2022cv07637
Plaintiff:
Doctor's Associates LLC and Subway IP LLC
Defendant:
Lyudmila Khononov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Trocom Construction Corp. v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2015cv04537
Plaintiff:
Trocom Construction Corp.
Defendant:
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. , Empire City Subway and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Doctor's Associates Inc. v. Subway Nevada, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00363
Plaintiff:
Doctor's Associates Inc.
Defendant:
Subway Nevada, LLC , Subway Nevada, Inc. , Frank Schreck and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Subway International B.V. v. Rautenberg
as 3:2014cv01780
Plaintiff:
Subway International B.V.
Defendant:
Andreas Rautenberg
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Subway International B.V. v. Seistola
as 3:2013cv01610
Plaintiff:
Subway International B.V.
Defendant:
Antti Seistola
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Palumbo v. Subway Real Estate Corp.
as 1:2013cv07404
Plaintiff:
Ronald Palumbo
Defendant:
Subway Real Estate Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Subway International B.V. v. Lavanderos et al
as 3:2013cv00584
Plaintiff:
Subway International B.V.
Defendant:
Ana Maria Moroni Lavanderos and Robinson Concha Vicencio
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Subway Development Corporation of Washington
as 3:2013cv00251
Plaintiff:
Doctor's Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Subway Development Corporation of Washington
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Subway International B.V. v. Vazbeck
as 3:2013cv00151
Plaintiff:
Subway International B.V.
Defendant:
Rachid Vazbeck
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Subway International B.V. v. Youssef
as 3:2013cv00152
Plaintiff:
Subway International B.V.
Defendant:
Attia Youssef
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
