Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Doctor's Associates Inc. v. Subway Nevada, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00363
Plaintiff:
Doctor's Associates Inc.
Defendant:
Subway Nevada, LLC , Subway Nevada, Inc. , Frank Schreck and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Subway International B.V. v. Rautenberg
as 3:2014cv01780
Plaintiff:
Subway International B.V.
Defendant:
Andreas Rautenberg
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Subway International B.V. v. Seistola
as 3:2013cv01610
Plaintiff:
Subway International B.V.
Defendant:
Antti Seistola
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Subway International B.V. v. Lavanderos et al
as 3:2013cv00584
Plaintiff:
Subway International B.V.
Defendant:
Ana Maria Moroni Lavanderos and Robinson Concha Vicencio
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Subway Development Corporation of Washington
as 3:2013cv00251
Plaintiff:
Doctor's Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Subway Development Corporation of Washington
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Subway International B.V. v. Vazbeck
as 3:2013cv00151
Plaintiff:
Subway International B.V.
Defendant:
Rachid Vazbeck
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Subway International B.V. v. Youssef
as 3:2013cv00152
Plaintiff:
Subway International B.V.
Defendant:
Attia Youssef
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Subway International B.V. v. Yucebas
as 3:2013cv00091
Plaintiff:
Subway International B.V.
Defendant:
Firat Baha Yucebas
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Subway International B.V. v. Demir
as 3:2013cv00090
Plaintiff:
Subway International B.V.
Defendant:
Ergun Demir
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Subway International B.V. v. Dyonizy
as 3:2013cv00059
Plaintiff:
Subway International B.V.
Defendant:
Damian A. Dyonizy
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
