Cases filed in New York
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Mitchell v. Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
as 7:2024cv06818
Defendant: Dilip Shanghvi, Uday Baldota, Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
Plaintiff: Neal A. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv Fed. Question: Securities Violation
In re ACTOS Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv09244
Plaintiff: 199 SEIU-National Benefit Fund, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health a and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: A.F. of L. - A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, City of Providence, Rhode Island, Crosby Tugs, LLC and others
Defendant: Actavis plc, Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Mylan, Inc. and others
Consolidated Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals Inc. and American Sales Company, LLC
Amicus Curiae: Cesar Castillo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
IN RE NAMENDA INDIRECT PURCHASER ANTITRUST LITIGATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv06549
Plaintiff: Sergeants Benevolent Association Health & Welfare Fund and A.F. of L.- A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan
Consolidated Plaintiff: MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC and MSPA Claims I, LLC
Petitioner: JM Smith Corporation
Defendant: Actavis, plc, Forest Laboratories, LLC, Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH & Co. KGaA and others
Consolidated Defendant: Allergan plc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
In Re: Actos Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv03278
Plaintiff: American Sales Company, LLC, Meijer, Inc. and Meijer Distribution, Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff: Cesar Castillo, Inc.
Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Takeda America Holdings, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Self-Insured Schools of California v. Jazz Pharmaceuticals PLC et al
as 7:2020cv06495
Defendant: Lupin Ltd., Endo Pharmaceuticals LLC, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc and others
Plaintiff: Self-Insured Schools of California
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC et al v. Allergan PLC et al
as 1:2019cv10184
Defendant: Merz GmbH & Co. KGaA., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd and others
Plaintiff: MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC and MSPA Claims I, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cesar Castillo, Inc. v. Ranbaxy Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06126
Defendant: Ranbaxy U.S.A., Inc., Ranbaxy Inc., Ranbaxy Laboratories, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff: Cesar Castillo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al v. Saptalis Pharmaceuticals, LLC
as 2:2018cv02545
Plaintiff: Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and Ranbaxy Signature, LLC
Defendant: Saptalis Pharmaceuticals, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
In re: Fluocinonide Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2016mc08911
Plaintiff: Sergeants Benevolent Association Health & Welfare Fund , Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund and UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund
Defendant: Fougera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Sandoz, Inc. , Novartis International AG and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
In re: Topical Corticosteroid Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2016mc07000
Plaintiff: Sergeants Benevolent Association Health & Welfare Fund , United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midwest Health Benefits Fund , NECA-IBEW Welfare Trust Fund and others
Defendant: Fougera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Sandoz, Inc., Taro Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?